Saturday, 22 October 2011

Picking a fight - Macmillan article.

 http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/picking-a-fight

After reading this article, I'm starting to believe that language variation which is dependant on gender is actually down to performativity - I think that people use language in a way which is expected of them; which links in with convergence and divergence - people clearly adapt their speech dependant on situation; so maybe that's the reason men and women have different conversational styles?

They're expected to speak a certain way?! If a man was to adopt a more feminine style, people would make assumptions... and vice versa with women.
Are the differences ever so slight? maybe. They're significant enough to make a difference though.

The three main problems highlighted with gender differences in language: 
1) It's dependant on the situation.
2) Power and status.
3) The language we use is a choice.

 There are always going to be variables...

Locke's evolutionary model: "men and women talk differently because our male and female ancestors followed different evolutionary paths”> male verbal behaviour is characterised by ritualised displays of aggression and power > women weren't built this way. 

Of course, Locke's theory reinforces Judith Butler's performativity theory > people use language how they're expected to.

Saturday, 15 October 2011

Intervention: Language and Gender.

Is gender really more than what you're born with?  
Verbal interaction plays a key role in the diffrentiation of gender, says linguists.
 
Gender is defined as :”a wide set of characteristics that are seen to distinguish between male and female,” but there's more to the story...
 
The nature vs nurture debate is something that has been debated for centuries, scientists tend to believe that gender is defined by nature, but linguists take the nurture approach and have argued that gender is more than a state, more than appearance, more than what you're born with but is actually defined by the characteristics you display whilst using language.
 
Linguistically, men and women are alien to eachother, different species, it's like there's a language barrier and nobody can really interpret the true meaning of an utterance from the opposing gender. The book Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus reflects the extrinsic nature of gender communication. If gender was really only down to nature, surely we'd all speak the same language?
 
So are you linguistically the same gender? It's hard to say. Deborah Tannen has investigated how male / female communication differs and created a model to represent the characteristics one posseses when speaking, you tend to abide by either one of these lists, it is said that linguistic features used in interaction define your gender, and people use language for alternate purposes.
 
Verbal interaction for either gender have different purposes. As we all know, women use language to express their feelings, to gain sympathy and obtain a sense of intimacy with their 'linguist partner'. Men tend to verbalize only when it's necessary, to solve problems, to assert independence / status and to lecture other people expressing their dominance.
 
The characteristics defined by Tannen reinforce Robin Lakoff's deficit model theory -she claims that women's language makes them seem weak and uncertain and use language solely for emotive response compared to men who only use language for practical purposes, to achieve a goal or solve a problem. It's clear to see that there is clear gender difference in the way people use language; mainly due to the purposes of which language is used.
 
Despite the fact that women are seen to be inferior and weak in conversation, it is notoriously known that women work harder in conversations in order to maintain them; this is backed up by the works of Pamela Fishman. She argues that women are more expressive and tend to use more tag questions to keep the conversation flowing, men tend to be lazy during interaction and often give minimal responses to show agreement and that they're listening but don't really offer their own opinions, unless of course they're delivering a lecture; which raises the question, do women really have dominance in conversation if they're maintaining communication or do men possess all the power and let women waffle?!
 
Typical feminine language has been characterised as expressing uncertainty, having a rising intonation (which makes everything seem as if it's a question) and using superpolite terms, among other things; which makes female use of language the more favourable style, women tend to be the supportive figure, showing keen listening and expressing sensitivity, in addition to this, women avoid using strong swear words which makes females the more approachable gender.
 
In terms of male communication, they tend to ask questions in order to extend their understanding and obtain the information they desire, in comparison to females who often use questions in a rhetorical manner in order to attract attention to themselves. Males use strong statements to get their message across effectively, they don't avoid the usage of strong statements as these are seen as most effective and help to affirm their status.
 
MALE VS FEMALE COMMUNICATION.
  1. Women = Rapport > Men = Report.
  2. Women = Sympathy > Men = Problem solving
  3. Women = Listening > Men = Lecturing.
  4. Women = Private > Men = Public.
  5. Women = Connection > Men = Status
  6. Women = Supportive > Men = Oppositional.
  7. Women = Itimacy > Men = independence.
*Gender difference model created by Deborah Tannen to show the purposes of language usage dependant on gender.
 
O'Barr and Atkins tested Lakoff's ideas, they came to the conlusion that the features characterised were actually used by both genders and are linked to lack of power thus challenging the nurture debate, although they have stated that gender is one of the significant variables which contribute to the genderlect of an individual.  

Another theorist that challenged the idea of women being insuperior is Janet Holmes, she investigated the use of tag questions and concluded that they didn't always show uncertainty and were instead a means of maintaining conversation and showing an interest; contrasted against the works of Deborah Jones who reinforced the idea that women still fulflled their matriachal roles and only used language for these purposes: gossip, housetalk, scandal, bitching and chatting which is a view which seems a little outdated these days as society has changed and gender equality is at an all time high.

Jennifer Coates argues that men use language competitvely, interupting a lot more than women do, and express verbal agressiveness. In contast to women who use language cooperatively, in order to support the other participants, create links between speaker turns and provide self-disclosure.
 
Despite all of the theories which argue that gender is actually constructed through nurture and is actually learnt behaviour, there's one theorist who challenges them all. Deborah Cameron believes it's all a myth. She thinks that gender doesn't affect language at all and there are significant similarities in the way men and women use language with insignificant differences, stating that language isn't a variant at all!
 
Taking the evidence into account, you can only make your own interpretation about whether gender is more than what you're born with... you may believe that it's innate, you may believe that it's learnt behaviour.. there isn't a definitive answer, although it's clear, that to an extent, your language use does define you as a person.

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Fry's Planet Word: Identity.

  • Most favourable accent is Newcastle. >Gives feel good factor.
  • Trustworthy, helpful.
  • Accents are one of the most vital parts in speech processing.
  • RP gives a sense of authority.
  • RP is perfect for resolution>helping to sort problems.
  • Accent varies perception.
  • Your language and culture shapes the way you view the world, e.g. in foreign languages, objects that are grammatically feminine or masculine are described using varied adjectives, e.g if an object is feminine, it would be described as 'lovely' 'elegant' 'beautiful''; or masculine > strong, long. 
  • Irish doesn't have as many words as the English language but the descriptions are much more vibrant. 
  • English is the 'social language' -Irish is rarely used in Ireland.
  • Cuisine and language are linked - recipes were spread through word of mouth.
  • A lot of languages are in danger of extinction. >Linguiside.
  • With minority languages, people are punished if they speak an 'unfavourable' language.
  • Language = identity and pride.

    Personal response:I particularly enjoyed the part about the effect that being bilingual has on your view of the world, as I study French, I understand the differentiation of gender based objects and whether certain things are masculine or feminine, so this debate proved very interesting to me. I think that it's a shame that some of the minority languages are diminishing over time, there must be a way of preserving them?!
    STEVEN FRY CAN SPEAK FRENCH FLUENTLY! :O

Fry's Planet Word - Babel.

Focus on language acquisition and how our genes are responsible for our abilities to obtain language. It was interesting although I didn't feel the need to make notes on it because it isn't relevant to this year. :) I'm finding this series quite interesting as it's full of facts about language which really interest me. My family were shocked when I told them that I actually enjoyed educative documentaries, I tried to explain some of the things I learnt from the documentaries but they dismissed my comments as they didn't understand me!

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Fry's Planet Word - Taboo Language.

  • Taboo language varies dependant on culture. 
  •  Swear words are derived from the same pool of anxieties: religion,sex,death,illness,excretion and bodily fluids. 
  • Cognitive professor of language Steven Pinker has a theory: "It's generally topics that are surrounded by negative emotion, seems to be the common denominator
  • Excretion elicits the emotion of disgust.
  • Religion elicits the emotion of dread / supernatural powers.
  • Timothy Jay has a theory as to why swear words are linked to emotions: it comes from the emotion associated with the first time that you use the word. Emotion tag is associated with the word.
  • Swearing is linked to pain, it's a form of relief.
  • Involuntary absorption of taboo language.
  • Emotional release when you swear.
  • A swear word makes a dull sentence so much more emphatic - this is called a 'jab line'.
  • Taboo language often victimises homosexuals.
  • British people tend to enjoy the humour associated with taboo language.
  • 'Round the horne' radio show - uses a lot of puns and innuendo.
Euphemisms. 
  • More offensive and controversial than swearing.
  • Often means something very offensive and the phrase softens the phrase.
  • Linguistic ambiguity.
  • Used to hide the harshness of a statement. e.g. 'Passed away'. 'Rainbow's end'.

    Politeness:
  • Is another form of euphemisms, but used to avoid hurting someone's feelings.

    We modify our languages and change our words, we use euphemisms to protect delicate ears and spare our blushes. 

    Polari.
  • A lot of taboo language originates from Polari, the language predominately used by gay men.
  • Mixture of Italian, gypsy, backslang. 
  • Trolling = cruising.
  • Secret language strengthens the community.

    Teen speak:
  • Kids have their own language - slang empowers them.
  • You have to be part of an ingroup.
  • American teenagers published a dictionary of slang terms but it's now outdated.
  • New words tend to come in through music.
  • Hip hop has brought in ghetto language into the mainstream.
  • 'Yo homie, wu'sup?' 
  • Language circulates when you speak it. >through the media / culture.

    --------------------
                              Making something taboo just adds to its power.

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Reasons for overlaps:


  • Minimal response.
  • To show that you're listening e.g. hmm, mm, yeah.
  • Abruptness.
  • Topic change.
  • Early response to a question.
  • Misreading of turn taking signals.
  • Excitement over the topic being spoken about.

Reasons for stressed words:


  • Emphasis on an important idea.
  • Defensive.
  • Emotive.
  • Dramatic.
  • Annoyance.

Reasons for pauses.


  • Space for reply.
  • Recalling details.
  • Hesitation.
  • Sensitivity.
  • Embarrassment.
  • Nervousness.
  • Annoyance.

Monday, 3 October 2011

The whole 'Like' debate.

I just read that article from http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2011/09/27/do-you-like-like/
and I find the whole debate quite interesting. The fact that 'like' has entered the English language as a filler is quite weird, I mean, it's only a recent thing... why has it happened? I think it's probably down to youth culture, teenagers being lazy with language (much like myself, sometimes!) It's true that 'like' is often used instead of 'said' - I'd say this only happens among younger speakers, but is becoming increasingly popular. 


Another theory as to why 'like' is being used in a different context is the influence of American English - It's true that the UK is heavily influenced by America, mainly through the media - We, as a nation, watch tons of American television shows, DVDs and subconsciously absorb their culture on a daily basis through the medium of the media, so it's no wonder why their language is having an influence on the English language.

Another example of how American English has influenced our language is the spelling of 'Mum' - In England, it has always been spelt 'mum' but most recently, there has been an increase in the amount of people who spell it as 'mom' -like American English! < Here, I take the prescriptivist view, as I believe that the spelling that we use here is dependent on our pronunciation - we do not say MOM. 


Even the spellcheck doesn't appreciate it.

Features of spoken language:

Birmingham model: 
I  - Initiation.
R - Response.
F  - Feedback.

-Structure.
 -Informality / unplanned. -> Ellipsis, contractions, overlaps, non standard, deixis.
-Non fluency features -> Fillers, false starts, pauses, overlaps / interruptions. 


NVAS - Non Verbal Aspects of speech.


V - Volume
I - Intonation / pitch.
P - Pace.
S - Stress / emphasis.


NVC - Non Verbal Communication.
-Body language.

Polari.

  • Language variation dependent on sexuality.
  • It's an anti-language.
  • Mainly used by homosexuals.
  • Originated when homosexuality was illegal.
  • Mainly used in London.
  • Paul Baker estimates that there are 500 words in the Polari language.
  • Polari is largely used by the traveller community and The circus.
  • Also known as 'Palare'.
  • Mainly used by gay men and the theatre community.
  • Used on 'Round the Horne' radio show.
  • Form of protection / secrecy. 
  • Excluded outsiders.

    Examples:
  • Bevvy.
  • Bitch.
  • Camp.
  • Batts (shoes.)
  • Chicken (young).
  • Ecaf (anagram of face).

Sunday, 2 October 2011

  • Anti-language.
  • Socialect (Language used by a certain social group)
  • Language showing attitudes and values.
  • Morphology (How words change / made up of smaller parts)

Medical.

  • Technical slang.
  • Professional.
  • Formal.
  • Unethical / offensive.
  • Mainly used orally, emails and informal memos.
  • Medical jargon is in decline.
Examples:
  • Blood suckers / leeches - meaning taking blood.
  • TTFO.
  • Disco biscuits - Ecstasy.

Jack-speak (Navy)

  • Dialect of Navy.
  • Subject of comprehensive dictionaries.
  • Long history & culture.
  • Used for easy communication.
  • Used metaphors.
  • Communication without embarassment.
  • Military slang.
  • Used generally not just on the Navy ships.

    Examples:
  • Pudding club = pregnant.
  • Long shot = little chance of success.
  • Brass monkeys.